Dangers of Splenda

Posted on May 23, 2007 under Splenda| Health

With the rising popularity of low carbohydrate diets, and increase in sales of sugar-free foods and drinks, is it any wonder that the market for sugar substitutes is becoming more and more competitive? Products such as NutraSweet, Equal, and Sweet’N Low have been on the shelves for years, even though it is widely known that they do pose some health risks.

Many people — American’s at the top of the list -— consume many times more sugar than recommended in their daily diets, so trying to cut down one’s sugar intake is a worthy goal. Of course, it’s common knowledge that the first step to losing weight is reduction of calories, and sugar is pure calories with no nutritional value. But sugar also acts like a drug, like an addiction, and cutting it out of one’s diet is easier said than done. Not only is there a mental dependence, but there is a physical one also. Sugar affects the body in complex ways—producing serotonin in the brain and causing the insulin spike, which is the ‘sugar rush’ that is the real craving, and the reason sugar addiction is so hard to kick.

Splenda is the newest product in a long line of sweeteners and substitutes promising the taste of sugar without the effects of sugar consumption. This can be construed as true in a literal sense. It is true that Splenda has none of the dangerous effects of sugar on the body - no calories, no insulin boost, no cravings. Unfortunately, while many hundreds of times sweeter than sugar, Splenda poses its own unique health risks and dangers, according to many experts. The fact that the FDA approves or doesn’t approve a particular product, really in no way assures it is safe. Powerful lobbies make their living pushing through products that have no business being in the marketplace, while blocking others that pose an economic threat to investment.

Splenda is different from other sweeteners in that it claims to be ‘made from sugar,’ and ‘natural,’ because Splenda is the trade name for sucralose. Sucralose is a synthetic compound, which — without going into too much scientific detail –is basically sugar modified by adding chlorine atoms. Sucralose, incidentally, was discovered in the 1970s by researchers looking to create a new pesticide. Chlorine is added to many products - drinking water, for example - and does not necessarily render the product dangerous. On the other hand, you are ingesting chlorine, which is not advised in large amounts.

The reason Splenda produces no calories, is that the majority passes through the body without being digested. Most studies show that only around 15% of Splenda is actually digested. The worrisome fact for some researchers is that people with healthier GI systems, will absorb more of the Splenda, and thus more of the dangerous chlorine.

The results of the tests done by Splenda’s manufacturers, McNeil Nutritionals, are also quite worrisome. Their studies revealed that test rodents suffered from dangerous side effects such as shrunken thymus glands, and enlarged livers and kidneys … and there were only short term studies. No long term studies were performed before Splenda was approved by the FDA. One could say that the long-term study is being conducted in households and supermarkets across America, with consumers as the test rodents.

Of course, Splenda is not likely dangerous in smaller doses, but what about larger ones in which larger quantities of chlorine are ingested? Herein lies the bigger problem. Perhaps the greatest reason for Splenda’s success in the marketplace is that, as opposed to the other sweeteners, Splenda remains stable at higher temperatures, meaning that it can be, and is, used in cooking. Many of the sugar-free, and low-calorie diet foods use Splenda in their recepies. People on diets are at greater risk, obviously, because they may consume this product many times a day without knowing it.

A small segment of the population is allergic to sucralose, and the reactions produced in this group can be everything from rashes, panic attacks, headaches, to intestinal cramping, diarrhea, muscle aches, and stomach pain. Findings for allergic reactions are well-documented, but for the rest of the population, the studies are murky, at best.

As with any nutritional supplement, caution and due diligence should be practiced. Read and learn all you can, and consult with you doctor before starting on any new diet. If you are already dieting, be sure to read the labels to see if the diet foods are using Splenda in the place of sugar, and make sure that you aren’t replacing the bad effects of sugar with the potentially dangerous side effects of Splenda.

Comments

9 Responses to “Dangers of Splenda”

  1. Denise on September 27th, 2007 10:25 pm

    Thankyou for your information. I have been on a diet and downing Splenda. I have been getting sicker and sicker. Stomach pain, leg cramps, nausea ext. I stopped using it for the last few days and the symptoms have stopped.
    I went to look up information about splenda on a gut instinct. Thankyou.. I will be throwing all of my splenda products away.
    Denise

  2. Sara on October 2nd, 2007 12:39 pm

    I wonder why splenda left a pool like taste thanks for the info and where can I find stevia?

  3. jenn on November 3rd, 2007 4:08 pm

    I have done a personal study and noticed I am greatly effected by sugar substitutes. Asparthamine gives me major headaches and Spleda makes me feel like i am going to crawl out of my skin. i feel liek i have to move and i just geniunely feel gross. i feel “toxic”. It is a horrible feeling. I would much rather eat sugar and maybe walk a little further than to use these artifical sweeteners.

  4. Mreik: Per your request, Nutritional Sticky - workout - exercise - fitness - forum - articles - training - hiit - creatine - bowfles - WorldFitness Training Forum on November 15th, 2007 1:23 pm

    […] […]

  5. Janet on November 18th, 2007 6:58 pm

    I have recently stopped using Splenda as I had just heard about the negative side effects. I lost about 15 lbs this past year going from about 155lbs to 140lbs. (I am 5ft 6in) This was a part of my diet and exercise plan. I would still like to loose another 10 lbs. What do you think of using pure maple syrup as a sweetner? I am much more concerned about my health than loosing the last 10 lbs I’d like to loose. Any comments as to what should be used as a sweetener or do I need to just learn to live without them to begin with.
    Thanks, Janet

  6. My Fat loss masterplan. what do u think guys? help needed - workout - exercise - fitness - forum - articles - training - hiit - creatine - bowfles - WorldFitness Training Forum on November 20th, 2007 5:28 pm

    […] […]

  7. Barb on January 13th, 2008 3:09 pm

    I also had been having terrible stomach pain, my physician put me on an stomach acid reducing medicine but with not much help. I spoke to my sister and she told me about splenda and some of the side effects. I listened and stopped my morning latte with sugar free vanilla syrup and felt better after a few days. Well, I do so love to have a next to no calorie sweet latte so I just went back to my old habit for just two mornings and now I feel awful! I have sharp pain in the middle of my stomach with nausea. I am getting rid of all sugar free products I have!

  8. Joe on January 16th, 2008 4:36 pm

    I heard about the dangers of splenda. So I thought I would check it out.I have been using it for almost 2 years now and I have not had a problem at all.but,I am not eating it like candy either.

  9. carmen on January 22nd, 2008 9:52 pm

    i used splenda for a year, i broke out in a rash the size of a nickel on my knee and one small area of my stomach my doctor didn’t know what was causing it. i stopped using splenda the rash has gone away.

Leave a Reply